Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Natural Destiny - Capitalist Pig -


Natural Destiny
Capitalist Pig, Bitch, Mad Cow, Yellow Chicken, Rezdog... No one of our relations is left safe from those insulting expressions which impregnate us so deeply that usually we let them out despite ourselves. This vocabulary is not only scornful toward the animals but also it is unjust: the cow are mad only since they were forced feed with residual meat powder instead of their traditional vegetarian menu, the chicken are courageously facing their sad existences , a pig is dirty only if his concentration camp is not well-washed, and if a Rezdog claims to have a frenetic sexual activity, he would only be productive twice a year in the dogs true matriarchal society in which a bitch is not a prostitute but a caring mother. This disrespect is significant: it is through the linguistic gathering that we conceive our thought, that we extract a sense from it, then a conscience, that moreover we pretend to be a human essence. What we call our language is the reveller of the out-look build on the creation and from the position that the human being imagine to take up in her name. So be it, to speak about environment instead of invoking the nature shows how the anthropocentric materialism dominates our actual system of thinking: the environment is not much than the pre-text surrounding this God in which the being recognizes his ego; he is no more the nature, this lost animist bliss, forgotten into the incarnated worlds reign. Following the religions that have already separated us from the life by conferring to the creation a divine status, the science teaches us to see in it an escapee from the chaos mechanic, and governed by disincarnated laws. From now on we are ignoring the language of the nature or we only know from it diverse translation, religious or mechanical. But our explanations are false because the beauty is exiled. The one who love the nature perceives a manifest form of solitude- her solitude- that lonely among the poets the animals, may be, understand yet - The animal condition is the silent testimony of all that we have lost on our way: we who pretend to be human will only be relieved when contemplating with dread the whys and the wherefores, the nature has been abducted from the lands of our spirits.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Law expert: public within their right to seek Pope arrest warrant


A leading international law expert claimed the public are perfectly within their right to approach their local magistrate to seek an arrest warrant for the Pope during his visit to Britain later this year.

Calum Liddle

Friday, 3 September 2010
31 August 2010

A leading international law expert claimed the public are perfectly within their right to approach their local magistrate to seek an arrest warrant for the Pope during his visit to Britain later this year.

Professor Philippe Sands QC made the comments in a public debate as part of the Edinburgh Festival's Spirituality and Peace programme on Saturday.

Speaking about Benedict XVI's impending visit to the UK, he said: “In terms of individual claims being brought forth, it depends on what the claim is about. There are certain international conventions in which when an individual crime is committed and that crime is capable of being subject to legal proceedings of criminal law of any country in the world, the criteria has then been met for arrest and prosecution.”

“When someone enters a country, international law no longer has the same leverage, it uses the national legal system of that country, whether it be Scotland or England. Anybody can go to a magistrate with colourful evidence, and on the basis of that evidence a magistrate can issue an initial arrest warrant. Individuals are perfectly within their right to do that during the [Pope's] visit.

“I'm a very strong supporter of that model, albeit with obvious safeguards. It's a positive thing, it's a good thing, it's the right thing.”

Atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins and civil rights campaigner Peter Tatchell, among others, hope to have the Pope arrested on the same legal principal used to arrest Augusto Pinochet, the late Chilean dictator, on a Spanish warrant when he visited Britain in 1998.

Sands, the author of Lawless World, added: “The basic proposition exists; if you commit an international crime – torture, an act of genocide in a systematic way, a war crime - you are subject to arrest. It is the same reason why Tony Blair will not be doing book signings in certain jurisdictions around the world because there is a real and justified fear of arrest.”

Prominent Scottish human rights lawyer, Aamer Anwar – a fellow panellist during the open public debate on international law – said he wanted to see more “people power on the ground."

“We need to shift the argument of justice beyond international law. If we look at the last century, major changes over equality, suffrage and civil rights were possible because people demanded change.”

Anwar, a member of the Stop the War Coalition, encouraged people to “exercise their human and legal rights for what is morally correct."

The Genocide: the Earth becomes Environment


The The Genocide: the Earth becomes Environment:


Although for scientists the conquest of nature has a largely metaphorical meaning, it is only too literal for the appropriators of virgin lands, mining and logging companies, developers in general. We see the process going on all over the world today- for example in the virgin forests of Amazon, Malaysia, Alaska, Rain Bear Forest, BC, and so many. The civilized Man has exported his ideology of conquest everywhere, together with the technology and their god that makes it possible.

The most dramatic example of this process of transformation was the opening up of American West. It took place with a speed that amazed everyone and let us, today, knok-out in our big fat cars, our casinos, our gas stations, our bingo-halls as our dirty Indian bars, our strange churches. Into the abundant fertile lands moved relentless waves of speculators and settlers. Before them retreated the wilderness and the animist peoples who had lived so lightly on their sacred lands. In the 1860s, as the railroads reached out westward, meat was needed and there were buffaloes by the million. They were slaughtered wholesale or gunned down for pleasure; the supplies seemed limitless. Improved rifles were invented and more deadly methods of hunting. A great hide industry sprang up, and at its height, between 1872 and 1874, over 3 million buffalo were hunted to supply it. By 1880, though at first no one could believe it, the buffalo were gone. For a few years, their bleached remains were a source of profit as mountains of bones were shipped to glue factories and fertilizer plants. By the end of the century, fewer than a thousand of these animals survived in reservations, the pathetic remnants of the beautiful herds that only a few decades before had contained 30 to 50 millions of animal spirits...


"The more we can kill this year, the less will have to be killed the next war, for the more I see of these Indians the more convinced I am that all have to be killed or maintained as a species of pauper. Their attempts at civilization are simply ridiculous".

(General W. Sherman, 1860)


Stripped of their stories, the lands sacred to the animists peoples were no longer a gift of the great spirit to be held in common; they became real estate. The conquered territory was divided up and bought and sold as private property. A new symbolic landscape was superimposed on the old. But whereas the old one was animistic, related to the spirit of the place, the new one symbolized the imposition of a rational order upon the untamed wilderness and its division reflected the human separation with the nature, inside as outside... Much the same happened in Australia, New Zealand and other territories conquered and settled by Europeans. It is still going on today, as forest are divided up on maps and then destroyed in rectangles. Today as yesterday the old animistic order is superseded as bulldozers move in and the new order is imposed on the face of the earth. The scientific and technological conquest of nature expresses a mentality of domination that had been widespread in the ancient world but was vastly increased in power by technology and amplified by the belief in unlimited progress. And now, like the buffalo hunters, we can hardly believe what we have become.

Atjecoutay: I will never be silenced, the forest is not wild to me it is my home and I will live to defend HER!!!

AKAtjecoutay
Photos by Atjecoutay

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Lettre ouverte à Monsieur Louis Necker, Directeur Honoraire du Musée d’Ethnographie de Genève

Lettre ouverte à Monsieur Louis Necker, Directeur Honoraire du Musée d’Ethnographie de Genève

La décision de couper des arbres pour agrandir votre musée d’ethnographie n’a aucun lien avec les pratiques amérindiennes. En tant que représentants de la culture dominante vous manipulez les savoirs premiers pour servir vos propres dessins et convenances. Vous dénaturez l’essence de nos savoirs pour en rendre une image dans laquelle aucun Ancien-ne ne se reconnait. Vous continuez de nous exploiter artistiquement, culturellement, politiquement et spirituellement



Vous prétendez que « les indiens ne cessent d’abattre des grands cèdres pour fabriquer leurs totems » Vous affirmez que le musée valorisera les pratiques de développement durable de nos peuples, et ajoutez que « ces arbres seront remplacé s par d’autres » Ceci dénote d’un système de connaissance pauvre en mondes et s’inscrit dans une logique « progressive » de séparation d’avec la réalité naturelle

O-to-tem signifie « tu es de ma famille » en langue algonquine. « Famille » est à comprendre au sens de peuple,», ce qui désigne les arbres autant que les humains. . Non Messieurs, le Peuple n’abat pas ses parents pour les remplacer par de nouveaux dieux.



Vous allez construire un temple de plus, dédié à l’autosatisfaction. Contrairement à ce que vous affirmez, ce que vous appelez «vos « pièces » n’appartiennent pas aux genevois, pas plus qu’au musée. Elles appartiennent encore aux peuples et aux esprits qui en connaissent le sens.

Vous prétendez que votre musée contribuera à la préservation des espaces naturels qui sont encore les habitats de nos peuples. Permettez-moi d’en douter, si j’en crois le manque de connaissance dont vous faites preuve à l’égard de votre propre histoire.



L’homme dit civilisé s’est drastiquement coupé de la nature et vit dans l’ombre de la réalité, c'est-à-dire dans sa seule représentation, qu’il définit comme culture ou comme science, selon ses besoins immédiats. Pareille conception du monde est purement anthropocentrique. Vos linguistes nomment « environnement » la nature et « arbres » les grands pères ; les esprits vous les considérez comme des objets, et si vous daignez y attribuer une valeur, c’est en tant que « pièce » de collection.

Du temps de vos lointains ancêtres il vous était acquis que la nature était vivante. Mais depuis le 17ème siècle, un nombre croissant de vos érudits en sont venus à envisager l’univers comme une pièce morte Depuis, grâce à l’apparent succès de la technologie, la théorie mécaniste fondée sur l’orthodoxie officielle qu’est l'économie de développement est devenue une religion. Celle-là qui vous vaut la crise actuelle.

La conscience d’une nature vivante a de profondes implications . Elle bouleverse les habitudes et pointe vers un type de compréhension (du lakota « ancien, sacré »), une relation cohérente entre l'humanité et le monde vivant. Il est urgent de trouver des moyens pratiques de rétablir votre sentiment conscient de connexion avec la nature. Vous n’avez pas de temps à perdre et pas un arbre à abattre pour cela.

Animistement,,

Atjecoutay, Anishinabe.

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Scientific Detachment from Nature: Part 4 of Your System of Belief is Poor in Words"


Scientific Detachment from Nature

To this day, scientists pretend that they are rather like disembodied minds. Unlike other human activities, science is supposed to be uniquely objective. Scientific papers are conventionally written in an impersonal style, seemingly devoid of emotion. Conclusions are meant to follow from facts by a logical process of reasoning like that which might be followed by a computer. Nobody is ever seen doing anything; methods are followed, phenomenas are observed and measurements are made, preferably with instruments. Everything is reported in the passive voice. Even schoolchildren learn this style of detachment in their laboratory notebook : « A test tube was taken... »

All research scientists know that this process is artificial; they are not disembodied minds uninfluenced by emotion.

The reality is very different.

In the mythology of science, great men are seen as archetypal heroes, endowed with superhuman powers, often remembered as a glory to their nation and all so-called humanity.

Behind the myth of the hero is the animist shaman- in Sanskrit Shramana «the one who has a knowledge » in Tungu, whose disembodied spirit could travel into the underworld or into the heavens in animal forms. Like the spirit of the shaman, the mind of the scientist travels far up into the sky; he can look back and observe the earth, the solar system and the entire universe as if from outside. He can travel in the other direction down into the most minuscule recesses of matter. In his heroic quest of truth, journeying beyond the frontiers of knowledge into the unknown, he overcomes all obstacles and returns bringing knowledge and power to mankind. This archaic image of the disembodied journey is the mythic basis of scientific detachment; it is what makes it exciting and it has a long animist tradition behind it, denied, of course. The European philosophy grew up against this background but but it restricted its realm to the intellect and viewed the osul as nothing but the conscious mind detached from the body and from the nature herself.

But the ideal of scientific detachment is not confined to the ranks of professional scientists and technocrats; the first principle of his philosophy « I am thinking therefore I exist » has an all-pervasive influence on modern society, deepening the divisions between man and nature, mond and body, head and heart, objedctivity and subjectivity, quantity and quality.



The new evolutionary cosmology has moved from the world machine of classical physics. But it shares its mathematical quality; it gives us a model universe that is soundless, coloreless, tasteless, odoreless and, of ocurse, lifeless. This universe differs from the one we know through our senses; indeed it is inaccessible to the senses and knowable only through mathematical reason. But what kind of reality do such mathematical models represent ? Do they correspond to an objective mathematical order that is more real than the world we know through our senses? Sounds, smelles, colors, and feelings are nowhere to be ofund in physics because they are excluded form the start. Physics abstracts from the world only those features that can be treated mathematically, such as shape, size, position, motion, mass and electric charge; it deliberately ignores everything that cannot be quantified. This procedure is fundamental to physics, and it was made plain by Galileo in the early 17th. Century. Physics need take into account only hte mathematical aspects of things, their « primary qualities »; these alone are regarded as objective. Other qualities known through the senses « secondary qualities » are told subjective; they do not exist in the objective mathematical world knowable to a disembodied mind. In Galileo's words :

I think that these tastes, odors, colours, etc., on the side of the object in which they seem to exist, are nothing else than mere names, but hold their residence solely in the sensitive body; so that if the animal were removed, every such quality would be abolished and annihilated.

The practical success of mechanistic science bear testimony to the effectiveness of this method; the quantitative aspect of the world can indeed be abstracted and modeled. But such models leave out most of our living experience; they are a partial way of knowing. Nevertheless, the prestige that this method has acquired through physics has established it as the model of scientific detachment, the envy of biologists, sociologists, economists, and all those who aspire to scientific objectivity.


Antonymous-Animustanonymouist

Sunday, August 1, 2010

#1 The Rising Power of Mammon, #2 The Final Desacration, #3 Animism, Part 3 of "Your System of Belief is Poor in Worlds"





The Rising Power of Mammon

The most powerful of the idols in the desacralized world was Mammon. In the New Testament, he was the personification of riches; by the Middle-Ages, he had become the demon of commercial greed The famous Puritan poet, John Milton, depicted him as a fallen angel :

... even in heaven his looks and thoughts

Were always downward bent, admiring more

The riches of Heaven's pavement, trodden Gold,

Than aught divine or holy else enjoyed

In vision beatific: by him first

Men also, and by his suggestion taught,

Ransacked the Centre, and with imperious hands

Rifled the bowels of their mother Earth

For treasures better hid. Soon had his crew

opened into the Hill a spacious wound

And dug out ribs of Gold

Far older than the Christian conception of Mammon is the Sumero-Babylonian goddess Mammetun, the Mother of Destinies. Her name stems from the same linguistic root as our words mama, mammary, mammal and mother. And Mammon could be a masculine form of the name of the archaic goddess whose generous breasts were the source of plenty. The appropriation of her gifts by men was diabolical, and mammon was a male demon.

In India, wealth is still thought to flow from a goddess, Lakshmi, who is often depicted pouring out streams of gold coins from her inexhaustible vases of plenty. In ancient Rome, money was minted in the temple of Juno Moneta, the Great Mother in her aspect of adviser and admonisher. She is the source of our words money and monetary.

Money has many metaphorical aspects. Gold coins were like little images of the sun. But modern money is more alive, filled with a breath like spirit, subject to inflation and deflation. Money is also currency, and its flows is what animates the economy; like blood it circulates. Monetary assets are « liquid ». Like a milk-giving breast or udder,the economy works on the basis of supply and demand; it supplies the demands of consumers. And like a woman its behaviour is cyclic. Money is a human creation, and so is the economy that generates it, but it has taken on a life on its own. Economic forces rather than natural forces have come to dominate our lives, and the ruling power of our world is Mammon.



The Final Desecration



The rationalistic spirit in which the Protestant reformers attacked the practices of traditional religion was not brought to bear on their own beliefs. These depended on faith and on the authority of scripture. But once the forces of skepticism and iconoclasm were released, there was no stopping them. Secular humanism takes the Reformation to its ultimate extreme, turning the Protestant critique onto Protestant faith. In this second revolution, devotion to the words of the Bible in itself becomes a form of idolatry. What reason is there to accept its authority ? As for God, why should he not be like other gods, a phantom of the human mind ? Those whose religion is founded on a protest against other people's unreasoning faith have been ill equipped to defend and unreasoning faith on their own.


This ultimate reformation, the protest against Protestantism, leaves man as the source of all goddesses and gods, the Master of desacralized nature, the only conscious rational being in an inanimate world. For the secular humanist, nothing is sacred except human life. Indeed humanism can easily become a religion itself, glorifying man and his wondrous work. But the spirit of negation will never be far away; why should man be sacred ? He is just another species, thrown up by the blind forces of evolution and no doubt doomed to extinction like the dinosaurs. In the end, nothing at all is sacred and the result is disastrous.



Animism



In most cultures, traditional assumptions about the life of the natural world are simply taken from granted. But in ancient Greece, for the first time in Europe, these tacit assumptions were discussed and made explicit. Greek philosophers developed a conception of nature as a living organism that was inherited by their medieval ancestors. The great philosophers believed the world of nature was alive because of its ceaseless motion. Moreover, because these motions were regular and orderly, they said that the world of nature was not only alive but intelligent (from the Latin word intelligere: to understand), a vast animal with a soul and a mind on its own. Every plant or animal participated in the life process of the world's spirit, intellectually in the activity of the world's mind and materially in the physical organization of the world's body. All creatures had spirits. The spirit was not in the body; rather the body was in the soul, which permeated all parts of the body. Through its formative powers, it caused the embryo to grow and develop, so that the organism assumed the form of its species. For example, an acorn sprouted into a seedling and grew into an oak tree because it was drawn or attracted toward the mature form of the tree by its spirit, the spirit of the oak.

In animals, a further kind of spirit underlay sensory perception and behaviour and gave rise to the instincts: the animal or sensitive soul. The English world animal comes, obviously enough, from anima, Latin for « soul ». The human intellect was not separate form the animal and vegetative souls; rather the rational mind was linked to animal and bodily aspects of the same soul, which were generally unconscious. In other words, the human soul included both a person's conscious mind, or spiritual essence, and the life of the body, senses, intelligent activities and animal instinct. This understanding of the spirit clearly connected human life with the life of animal nature, as well as defining the differences between plants, animals, stones, elements, etc. At the same time, man was a microcosm of the entire cosmic organism, the macrocosm. Human societies likewise reflected the order of the universe and the movements and conjunctions of the planets were connected with lives and destinies. The Copernican revolution in astronomy, far from overthrowing the ancient idea of the cosmic organism, was in fact inspired by it. When Copernicus proposed that the sun, rather than the Earth, was at the center of the cosmos, he did so both because the geometrical order of the planetary spheres seemed more harmonious and because of his mystical reverence for the sun: « The Sun alone appears, by virtue of his dignity and power suited for this motive duty and worthy to become the ohm of god himself » The Copernican revolution began by replacing one model of the cosmic organism with another, but it soon led to the realization that the cosmos was not a closed system with a center. Rather it was an universe with no center at all; the stars were themselves suns and space stretched outward in all directions to infinity. The cosmic organism had had broken open. Then, trough the mechanistic revolution, the old model of the living cosmos was replaced by the idea of the universe as a machine. According to this new theory of the world, nature no longer had a life of her own: she was soulless, devoid of all spontaneity, freedom and creativity.




This new worldview was first articulated in 1619 in Germany. There, the 23 years old Rene Descarte had a visionary experience; he was « filled with enthusiasm and discovered the foundations of a marvellous science. »

The universe of Descarte was a vast mathematical system of matter in motion. Matter filled all space; it was the universal matrix. Everything in the material universe worked entirely mechanically according to mathematical necessities. His intellectual ambition was boundless; he applied this new mechanical way of thinking to everything: plants, animals and man. He laid the foundations for the mechanistic worldview in both physics and biology. In the philosophy of Descartes, all nature was inanimate, the soul was also withdrawn form the human body which became a mechanical automaton, leaving only the rational soul, the conscious mind in a small region of the brain, the pineal gland. Since the time of Descartes the favored region has moved a couple of inches to the cerebral cortex, but essentially the idea remains the same. The mind somehow interacts with the machinery of the brain, although how the two are related is still an impenetrable mystery.

Descarte's vision is still, more than three and a half centuries later, the dream of many biologists. The material parts of the seed that are now supposed to determine the form of the organism's life are now the gene. Descarte's doctrine that plants and animals were mere machines furthered his explicit aim of making men « lords and possessors of nature. ». Animals were automate like clocks, capable of complex behaviour but laking spirits. Descartes himself dissected the heads of animals, trying to find a physical explanation of imagination and memory, and through vivisection he studied the pumping mechanisms of their hearts and souls, denying that animals could feel pain:

« The cry of a beaten dog no more proves that it suffered than the sound of an organ proves that the instrument feels pain when struck. »

Since animals were supposedly inanimate, men could be free from « any suspicion of crime, however often they may kill animals ». Hence there need be no further doubts about man's right to exploit the brute creation and all those designed as animals, savages, below-mans, etc.

AKAtjecoutay
photos by Atjecoutay

Sunday, July 25, 2010

The Triumph of the Gods

part two of: The Civilized System of Belief is Poor in Worlds


Your System of Belief is Poor in Worlds

Shall I take a knife and tear my mother's bosom ? Then when I die she will not take me to her bosom to rest. You ask me to dig for stone! Shall I dig under her skin for her bones ? Then when I die I cannot enter her body to be again. You ask me to cut grass and make hay and sell it, and be rich like white men! But how dare I cut off my mother's hair?






The earth was sacred both as the source of life and as the receiver of the dead. She bringeth all things to birth, reareth them and receiveth again into her womb. In many parts of the world, newborn babies were placed on the ground and then picked up again to represent their birth from the womb of the earth. At the same time the ceremony consecrated them to her and ensured that she would protect them. And to this day, even in the modern industrial societies, many people still want to be buried in their native land, to return to their earthly womb.


Mother was seen to be very active. She was thought to exhale the breath of life, which nourished living organisms on her surface. If pressure built up within, she would break wind, causing earthquakes. Fluids flowed within her, and hot water came out of her springs like blood. Within her body- or was it her mind?- there were veins, some of which contained liquids and other solidified fluids like metals and minerals. Her bowels were full of channels, fire chambers and fissures through which fire and heat were emitted in volcanic exhalations and hot springs. She bore stones and metals within her womb and nurtured them as they grew like embryos, within her, ripening at their own slow pace.


With the development of agriculture, the Mother gave way to a clearer and more restricted notion of a great goddess of vegetation and harvesting. (In Greece for example, Gaia was replaced by Demeter). But women were still very closely associated with the fertility of the soil, and they played a dominant role when agriculture was in its infancy; indeed they may well have invented agriculture. All over the world, metaphors connect women with the ploughed earth, the fertile furrow. In an ancient Hindu text for example: « This woman has come as a living soil: sow seed in her, ye men! » In the Koran: »Your wives are to you as fields. » This same metaphor is implicit in our world semen, the Latin for « seed ».




Nature was traditionally idealized as benevolent Mother in images of the Golden Age. All was peaceful and fertile; nature gave freely of her bounty; animals grazed contentedly; birds sang pure melodies; flowers were everywhere; and trees bore fruit abundantly. There was no disease or strife. Men and women lived in harmony. In the idylls of pastoral poetry, nature has already been subdued: flocks graze peacefully, unharnessed by wolves and other predators; the dark forest have been cleared and fertile fields established in their place; the wilderness has given way to orchards and gardens. Nature is calm, kindly like an ideal wife... The fear of wild, untamed nature feeds the desire to subdue her, a desire at least as old as civilisation.



The Triumph of the Gods





The ancient image of the Golden Age, usually regarded as a mythic or poetic^fantasy, has recently gained a new lease of life as a result of archaeological research in southern Europe and Turkey. The origins of settled agriculture in Europe have now been pushed back to about 7000 B.C. For several thousand years, these early societies of collectors lived in comfortable and usually unfortified settlements, worshiping goddesses, making superb ceramics rather than weapons. But between 4000 and 3500 B.C. This peaceful way of life was shattered by waves of invaders whose warrior gods dethroned the old goddesses, demoting them to wives, daughters and consorts in the new male-dominated pantheons. Patriarchy and male domination replaced the older, more harmonious social order.

Meanwhile, in the Near-East, the old goddess-worshiping societies likewise came to be dominated by fortified city-states and warring empires. Violin sky-gods became predominant, the vengeful senders of thunderbolts, floods, droughts, famines; the destroyers of peoples. The same happened in India, where old relatively peaceful societies were conquered by invading Aryan warriors, with their sky-gods and horses (!). All my relations, the pattern has often been repeated, and this looks like historical evidence that our ills stem from male domination. It also supports the hope that things could be otherwise; a different kind of society actually existed and could be possible again if we replaced the values of domination and patriarchy with the consciousness of partnership and matriarchal animism, as it was in each of our people- our animal, vegetal, mineral and human people- before the white invasion came to denature our memories of life.


However, the triumph of the warriors was reflected in new stories. To start with, the primal Mother was the source of all things. She was the virgin mother, she needed no god in order to conceive, and all the gods were descended from her. For example, according to one of the early Greek creations myths, first of all mother earth (Gaia) emerged from chaos. She then gave birth to Uranus, the sky-god, as she slept. He was both her son and her lover; in the earliest Babylonian creation stories, the primal goddess Tiamat was the formless void, the deep, the dark womb from whom the universe was born; she brought forth the world by herself. The god Marduk was originally her son. But then he became the creator god, slaying Tiamat, now pictured as the dragon of chaos.




When the Jewish people entered the Promised Land as pastoralist warriors it was already inhabited by Canaanites, Philistines and other peoples. As they settled there and adopted and agricultural way of life, local beliefs were assimilated into their religion, as were many of the ancient places of power such as holly wells, sacred oaks and terebinth trees. For many generations they worshiped at the old « high places » and groves sacred to the Queen of heavens. These sanctuaries were equipped with stone pillars, altars for animal sacrifices and tree stumps known as Asherahs, the name of the ancient goddess.

The religion of the Jews resembled many others in the recognition of sacred places and times and in the offering of sacred animals. But one of the ways it differed was its insistence on the uniqueness of its God; another was through the prohibition on the making and worshiping of representations of the God. These features of Judaism were inherited by Christianity and Islam and have had profound historical effects.


In the 1st. Chapter of the book of Genesis, the primal Mother is again the formless void, the dark, the watery abyss. Unlike Marduk, God did not fight with her, but He first created by dividing- the light from the dark, day from night, the waters above from the waters below, the heaven from the earth and the dry land from the sea. When it came to the creation of plants this God evoked them but did not make them himself. They were formed and brought forth by the mother, the earth:


He said: « Let the earth produce growing things; let there be on earth plants that bear seed, and trees bearing fruit each with its own kind of seed » So it was (...)

Likewise he called forth animals from the earth, and sea creatures and birds from the waters. In theological terminology, this was not a direct but a mediate mode of creation.


Although the Judeo-Christian tradition has always emphasized the supremacy of the male God, the earth retained some of her old autonomy for many centuries. The Jews were forbidden to worship the old goddess-mother, but nevertheless the holy land remained both sacred and female. Throughout the Middle-Ages, Christians continued to regard nature as animate and mother like. Mary was Queen of Heaven, a title inherited from Asarte-Ashtoreth, the aspect symbolized in her blue, star-spangled cloak; she is lunar, like Artemis, and is often depicted standing on a crescent moon, and as Virgin Mother of God, she is heir to the ancient tradition of the primal Mother. And like the Earth Mother who gave life and took it back, she is present at death: « Holy Mary, mother of Good, pray for us at the hour of our death »




The complete supremacy of the Father was not established until the Protestant Reformation, in the 16th. Century, with the suppression of the Holy Mother's cult and the final desacradization of the natural world. The Protestant reformers were trying to establish a purified form of Christianity, rejecting the abuses of the Roman Church. Personal faith and repentance were what mattered; ritual observances, seasonal ceremonies, pilgrimages, devotion to the holy mother and the cults of the saints and angels were all denounced as pagan superstitions. The Protestants were trying to bring about an irreversible change in attitude, eradicating the traditional idea that spiritual power pervades the natural world and is particularly present in sacred places and in spiritually charged material objects. They wanted to purify religion and this purification involved the disenchantment of the world. All traces of magic, holiness and spiritual power were to be removed from the realm of nature; the spiritual realm would be confined to human beings.

This process was taken to its ultimate conclusion in the 17th. Century when nature became nothing but inanimate matter in motion, created by God and mechanically obedient to His eternal laws. Nature was no longer acknowledged as mother and no longer considered alive. She became the world-machine and God the all-powerful engineer. The material world was governed by God's laws and incapable of responding to human ceremonies, invocations or rituals; it was spiritually neutral or indifferent and could not transmit any spiritual power in or of itself. To believe otherwise was to fall into idolarty, transferring God's glory to His Creation. There was to be no attempt, even through religious means, to change the way the world operated; it should be accepted as an expression of God's will. In the influential view of Calvin, God had predestined all events from the beginning of time.


The Reformation thus prepared the ground for the mechanistic revolution in science in the following century. Nature was already disenchanted and the material world separated from the life of the spirit; the idea that the universe was merely a vast machine fitted well with this kind of technology, and so did the constriction of the realm of the soul to a small region of the human brain. The domains of science and religion could now be separated: science taking the whole of nature for its province, including the human body; religion, the moral aspect of the human soul.

This religious revolution not only helped pave the way for the development of modern science but also provided a favorable environment for the growth of technology and the acceleration of economic development. Traditional and symbolic values attached to particular places, plants and animals, were replaced by monetary values.




Ironically, the idea that nature functioned mechanically and automatically rendered God increasingly superfluous, and by the late 18th. Century, he was fading away from the scientific worldview.


Nowadays we live in a desacradized world;. Of course certain ceremonies still have a religious significance, and so do certain places or certain animals and plants, such as cows for Hindus or horses for Indians... But there is nothing in the scientific worldview to support such an idea of sacredness. They are survivals from earlier epochs and their sense remains absent.

AKAtjecoutay
photos by Atjecoutay

Saturday, July 17, 2010

The Civilized System of Belief is Poor in Worlds



I came to recognize that the conflict I experienced so intensely was a symptom of a slip that runs through our entire civilisation. This split is experienced to differing degrees by almost everyone. It is now threatening our very survival.

From the time of our remotest ancestors until the seventeenth century, it was taken for granted that the world of nature was alive. But in the last three centuries, growing numbers of educated people have come to think of nature as lifeless. This has been the central doctrine of orthodox science- the mechanistic theory of nature.

We have to remember that what are now commonplace assumptions were one controversial theories, rooted in peculiar kinds of theology and philosophy, believed only by a handful of European intellectuals. Through the successes of technology, the mechanistic theory of nature is now triumphant on a global scale; it is built into the official orthodoxy of economic development. It has become a kind of religion. And it has led us to our present crisis.

Science itself has now begun to transcend the mechanistic worldview. The idea that everything is determined in advance has given way to the ideas of in-determinism, spontaneity and chaos. The hard, inert atoms of Newtonian physics have dissolved into structures of vibratory activity. The uncreative world machine has turned into a creative, evolutionary cosmos. Even the laws of nature may not be eternally fixed: they may be evolving along with nature.

Simple though the idea of living nature may sound, it has profound implications. It upsets deep-seated habits of thoughts; it points toward a new kind of science, a new understanding of spirituality... an old relationship between humanity and the living world. We urgently need to find practical ways of re-establishing our conscious sense of connection with living nature. We have No Time to lose.





Matriarchal nature and the desecration of the world

Like human mothers, nature has always evoked ambivalent emotions. She is beautiful, fertile, nurturing, benevolent and generous. But she is also wild, destructive, chaotic, smothering, death dealing- the Mother in her terrifying form, like Nemesis, Hecate or Kali.
The idea of nature as a mechanical inanimate system is in some ways more comforting; it gives a sense that we are in control and gratifyingly confirms our belief that we have risen above primitive animistic ways of thinking. Nature is less frightening if she can be dismissed as a superstition, a poetic turn of phrase or a mythic archetype confined to human minds, while the inanimate natural world remains there for us to exploit.




Although the conquest of nature for the sake of human progress is the official ideology of the modern world, the old intuition of nature as a mother still affects our personal responses.
The very words for nature in European languages are feminine- for example phusis in Greek, natura in Latin, la nature in French, die Natur in German. The latin world natura literally meant « birth ». The Greek world phusis came from the root phu whose primary meaning was also connected with birth. Thus our words physics and physical like nature and natural have their origins in the mothering process.

In animist beliefs (nowadays called mythologies), the great mother has many aspects. She was the original source of the universe and its laws and the ruler of nature, fate, time, eternity, truth, wisdom, justice, love, birth and death. She was Earth, Gaia, the mother of the sun, like Nun or Astarte. She was natura, the goddess Nature and she had many other silent names and images as the mother and matrix and sustaining force of All Thing.

These feminine associations play an important part in our thinking; our conception of nature is intertwined with ideas about the relations between women and men, between animals and gods, and between the feminine and the masculine in general. If we prefer to reject these traditional sexual associations, what are the alternatives to the idea of nature as organic, alive and mother like ? One is that nature consists of nothing but inanimate matter in motion. But in this case we only deny the mother principle by being unaware of it; the very word for matter is derived from the same root as mother- in Latin the corresponding words are material and mater- and the whole ethos of materialism is permeated with maternal metaphors.

The conception of nature as a machine brings another set of metaphors into play. Many mechanists assume that this way of thinking is uniquely objective, whereas they see the idea of living nature as anthropocentric, nothing but a projection of human ways of thinking onto the inanimate world around him. But surely the machine metaphor is more anthropocentric than the organic. The only machines we know of are man-made. Machine making is a uniquely human activity, and a relatively recent one too. The 17th. And 18th. Century conception of God as the designer and creator of the world machine cast him in the image of technological man. And in attempting to see all aspects of nature as machine like, we only project current technologies onto the world supposed to be around us.



We cannot help thinking in terms of metaphors, analogies, models and images; they are embedded in the language and in the very structure of our thought. Both animistic and mechanistic thinking are metaphoric. But whereas mythic and animistic thinking depends on organic metaphors drawn by the processes of life, mechanistic thinking depends on metaphors drawn from man-made machinery.
Since the earth is our immediate home, Earth was recognized before the wider domain of Nature was conceived of on a cosmic scale to include the vast expanse of the heavens. The image of earth as a mother is found in all aboriginal cultures, all over the world. In the late 19 century, this is how a man of the Wanapum tribe explained why he refused to till the ground :

Shall I take a knife and tear my mother's bosom ? Then when I die she will not take me to her bosom to rest. You ask me to dig for stone! Shall I dig under her skin for her bones ? Then when I die I cannot enter her body to be again. You ask me to cut grass and make hay and sell it, and be rich like white men! But how dare I cut off my mother's hair?

AKAtjecoutay
Photos by Atjecoutay

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Honouring the New Sacred Animals

The New-Sacred Animals


DOG is their messenger.



We are RELATED by the way of PETRO

The Great spirit of the corporate consumer movement!

OIL, GASOLINE/BENZENE, and any PLASTICS products such as polyester or poly, refined matter, all paints, raw materials or resource that has been extracted from the First and only Deity that gave BIRTH to all life on Earth, THE GREAT MOTHER and are Father the SUN.

In the past before the time of the Horse,” THE DOG DAYS” the people of the western hemisphere honoured the winged, four legged the water swimmers and the ones who crawl close to the earth as Sacred, Now as we slowly or rapidly lose touch with are pasts as most Animists/Tribal people have.



NOW Only the essences of these spiritual ways have come to exist in this, the “Consumer Movement”.
The buffalo, Eagle, bear and the Wolf
are soon to become what the Europeans have as “fairy Tales” of which was an Animist knowledge before the time of the patriarchal “ONE GOD” came to oppress the innocents of this land and all other lands.

Much like the sacred animals of the past we use the skin, flesh and most parts of the Pig, cow, hen and other so called “live stock” in our daily lives without even acknowledge the fact that they are sacrificed to sustain are” well being” there is no Honour in life and their existence, unlike the old ways of an Animist spirituality we have become generic and have lost touch with the sacred Animals simply because they are not used in are everyday lives, in a sense the essence of believe has adopted the ways of organized religion only the spirit exists not the sustenance to feed the people, one therefore follows blindly guided by an over whelming light, only because one has the desire to see who’s shining that ridiculously bright light in there face and still, one follows.



The ones who have adopted what’s left of the old ways cannot deny the fact that the sustenance to feed is missing in other words the matter does not exist in are everyday life. The Sacred Animals are not their at our disposal we have no buck skin that “WE” have hunted, spirit did not honour us with the body of the Sacred Animal to make prayer objects and buying them from a store does not count, one must go into the wild for them, or have them handed down to you from family , so we only honour the influence or a dogma, the essence of organized religion, so it is no wonder that one thinks it’s Ok or right to worship only the essence of what’s left of are Animist knowledge and to go on believing without the sustenance of matter which in the past, the ways of life had.




Now the ways of life at hand is the consumer movement and no matter how we convince ourselves or others of what is not, we are part of this movement, except for the tribes that have not yet be contacted.

We all may believe in a parallel existence or not but in relation to a sacred animal there is a physical and the metaphysical world around it, one without the other, it would ceases to exist, with the “New Sacred Animals” there is a void that needs to be filled with this co-existence, in the Animist Knowledge or the “Old Ways” the Animal, Tree, Rock or Person can only exist with its counterpart the spirit, and in the corporate consumer movement we lack our counterpart. Yes, one may think that you do have your counterpart the Eagle, wolf or whatever spirit animal that one may have adopted, but remember one does not have the sustenance or the “matter” to support a true relationship. What one does have is the Pig, Cow, Hen or the essence of the Dinosaur and other raw martial’s that has been refined to meet are needs to sustain are lifestyles, a now, there is one’s counterpart to create a true harmonious relationship between the metaphysical and the physical world of are Consumerist lifestyle, one can only and truly go on to exist by excepting that this is the reality of all are lives in this, The Consumer Movement and the New- Sacred Animals.

Kerry Red Atjecoutay of The Eight F.I.R.E.S. Society



It is at this time that the egocentric civilized race will be given a choice between two roads. If they choose the right road, then the Seventh Fire will light the Eighth and final Fire, an eternal Flame of tranquility and equality between all species, If the egocentric civilized race makes the wrong choice of roads, the destruction which they brought with them in coming to the Western Hemisphere will come back at them and cause much suffering and death to all the Earth's Inhabitants.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

The Institution of denial



Obama is a politician for the Capitalists...And as ONE can see what the Capitalists have done to the Indigenous peoples the Animals and the Earth and if ONE can not see this then the stupidity of "civilized Men" will continue and it does not matter if ONE disagrees, the evidence is there,, Its time to SOBER up and smell the stance of STUPIDITY - ONE!




I tend to look at myself from a political perspective, hoping to justify my condition by treating it as a challenge to the ameriKKKan way. I am an instrument of sabotage, a lose part in the national machine, a misfit whose job was to gum up the works. No one could look at me with out feeling shame or anger or pity. I am living proof that the system had failed, that the smug, overfed land of plenty was finally cracking apart - And with you we can OBomba them with DECEPTION... Then we can proceed to take ALLah there libertys - ALLah this and ALLah that is all we ever wanted.... PLEASE!!!



Considering this, could it be that our perception of civilization as a final, grand stage of human social evolution may somehow be faulty? Could it be that this way of life we call civilization may in fact be a wrong turn? One ground-breaking anthropologist who has called into question the standard interpretation provided by the likes of Encylopedia Britannica, has written:

Indeed, most of what we have learned to think of as our cultural evolution has in fact been interpretation. Moreover…this interpretation has more often than not been the project of the still prevailing dominator worldview. It has consisted of conclusions drawn from fragmentary data interpreted to conform to the traditional model of our cultural evolution as a linear progression from “primitive man” to so-called “civilized man”… (Eisler__)

In other words, the Brahmans who write our cultural mythology have shaped the facts to fit the conclusions; they have interpreted history to fit their idea of evolution from primitive culture to advanced culture, thereby reinforcing the idea of superiority of modern civilization—no matter how much that view conflicts with what is known of human civilization and its history.
“There are whole disciplines, institutions, rubrics in our culture which serve as categories of denial."

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

The air is fresh with the sweet scent of buffalo grass


The air is fresh with the sweet scent of buffalo grass. As you look to the horizon you can see all that is natural, walking without being disturbed, till you reach your migrational destination...

Just over 500 hundred years ago there was a force that impeded our direction, a force that has gone down in the Euro-American history books as the greatest conquest of civilized man... According to my point of view that would be rape, murder, disease, theft, lies and the unnatural occupation of my homeland.

Genocide is the political purgative of Euro-American progression and I personally am a survivor of this policy. But the attempt was unsuccessful: still we survive and live among those who were brought from Europe who now call the Americas their homeland.

The residential schools were one of the attempts to re-educate the Indigenous for this reason: the invaders inability to exterminate the tribal people. So to “save the man you must kill the Indian”. Up until the time of my mother and father, the last generation of residential school survivors- (but not the only ones-) those Indian children have been systematically de/re-programmed, battered, sexually abused, humiliated into submission and, at times, killed for resisting their forced brainwashing.

In present days, approximately 50,000 children are missing. This is the result of the residential school policy implemented by the US and Canadian governments under the care of the Roman Catholic Anglican Protestant and other churches.

Kerry Atjecoutay became aware of this truth from his parents, There, he heard stories of some of the atrocities that the Church had committed. Guided by the Duty of Memory, he courageously started to lift the veil on the complete history of what happened to the Native children in the Christian Residential Schools. Today, Kerry Atjecoutay is looking for answers: why this happened, how this happened, and where are the bones of these lost children. In this spirit, along with other concerned people to bring about a symbolic healing of the Church and the children that suffered under its “care”.

The Indigenous people are waiting for the Church authorities to recognize their participation and responsibility for the Genocide.

Animist Knowledge Association (animist espace) is honoured to be given the confidence of organizing their campaign and accepts this responsibility with conviction. With the supervision of Kerry Atjrcoutay, we will rally support in Switzerland, particularly in Geneva, where we will propose public conferences (Association House), projecting documentaries on genocide,. Together we will hold vigils in front of the United Nations. We also will propose a public debate at Animist Espace.

All propositions are welcome, and we are expecting your engagement and strong support for this major cause. Regarding in this direction, you are invited to join the organisation at ANIMISTespace, 4 rue Louis-Aubert, 1206 Geneva.
Thank you to confirm your presence at kredatjecoutay@yahoo.ca

In the spirit of Pontiac

Animist Knowledge Association AKA